ruleproc: implemented OP_FORWARD handling for TwoStep processor

WalterH

The current version of gromox (3.7.226 for the supported edition and 3.7.239 for the community edition) now fully supports the TwoStep rule processor.
This I found in the Release notes: ruleproc: implemented OP_FORWARD handling for TwoStep processor
So you can set lda_twostep_ruleproc = 1 in /etc/gromox/exmdb_local.cfg.
With this change, there is no need to use the old rule processor any longer.
ref: TwoStep processor

amaccuish

Does this mean the workaround for rules that use an internal email (we had to switch FROM from "is" to "contains) are no longer needed, or is that a separate issue?

WalterH

When you enable lda_twostep_ruleproc = 1 than this workaround is no longer needed. Please test it and report back.

MichaelN

Forwarding is now running with the twostep ruleproc, great.
I've checked it with "Umleiten" and "Weiterleiten" and the mail is forwarded in any case.
But i see no difference between these 2 cases. Should the mail still be in the inbox in the
case of "Umleiten" ?

WalterH

MichaelN One case places the mail in this mailbox, the other only transfers the mail to the selected mailbox.

WalterH

MichaelN I've checked it with "Umleiten" and "Weiterleiten" and the mail is forwarded in any case.

I assume you did this in the Admin-UI on the User - SMTP - E-Mail forward.
This is not a functionality from the TwoStep rule processor. But it should work.

MichaelN

WalterH
ok, so there is still an bug here, since in both cases the mail is placed in the mailbox.

MichaelN

WalterH
no, i do it with an user-rule in the webapp